January 09, 2024
By Scientific Data
A global dataset of biochar
application effects on crop yield, soil properties, and greenhouse gas
emissions
Scientific
Data volume 11,
Article number: 57 (2024) Cite
this article
-
137 Accesses3 Altmetric
Metrics
Abstract
Biochar application is widely studied to mitigate
the threats of soil degradation to food security and climate change.
However, there are big variations in the effects of biochar
application on crops, soils, and the atmosphere during crop
production. This study provides a global dataset of biochar
application effects on crop yield, soil properties, and greenhouse
emissions. The dataset is extracted and integrated from 367
peer-reviewed studies with 891 independent field, laboratory, and
incubation experiments across 37 countries. This dataset includes 21
variables before and after biochar application (including soil
properties, crop yield, greenhouse gas emissions, etc.) of 2438 items,
focusing on two main biochar application types: biochar application
alone and combined with fertilizers. Background information on climate
conditions, initial soil properties, management practices, and
characteristics of biochar sources and production is also contained in
the dataset. This dataset facilitates a comprehensive understanding of
the impact of biochar application, supports the utilization of
agricultural wastes for biochar production, and assists researchers in
refining experimental protocols for further studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background & Summary
Sustainable agricultural production and climate
change are two major challenges for agriculture. Biochar application
has been highly recommended as a potential agricultural management
practice to tackle the conflict between crop productivity and
greenhouse gas emissions1,2. Biochar is a stable carbon-rich byproduct
produced by the pyrolysis of biomass, such as agricultural and
forestry waste, in the absence of oxygen3. With high carbon content,
abundant pore structure, large specific surface area, and stable
physicochemical properties, it has the potential to improve soil
health and promote carbon sequestration4. Biochar incorporation can
increase crop yield by ameliorating soil physical structure, improving
nutrient availability, and enhancing microbial activities5,6. Besides,
biochar application also has a profound impact on soil organic carbon
decomposition and nitrogen transformation, which are mediated by
microbial communities3,7.
There is big variability and high uncertainty in the effects of
biochar application on crop yield, soil properties, and greenhouse gas
emissions8,9. Previous meta-analysis studies suggest that biochar
addition improved crop yield by 5–51%8,10, showing huge variations
among studies. Soil organic carbon (SOC) under biochar application is
12–102% higher than that without biochar, according to previous
meta-analysis studies11,12, showing the sequestration of soil carbon.
Research also showed that biochar application also had positive
effects on decreasing nitrate-nitrogen leaching and retaining
ammonium-nitrogen, thereby altering the migration dynamics of soil
nitrogen13,14. For greenhouse gas emissions, most studies demonstrate
the potential of biochar application on CH4 and N2O emissions
reduction15,16,17. Nevertheless, several studies illustrated there
were no significant effects on greenhouse gas emissions18.
Furthermore, a big variation lies in the effect of biochar application
on greenhouse gas emissions from previous studies, ranging from
9–72%19,20 and 14–60%20,21 for the reduction of CH4 and N2O emissions,
respectively. This could be the consequence of different management
practices adopted under biochar application conditions22. Greenhouse
gas fluxes may be influenced interactively by the co-application of
biochar and fertilizers, such as chemical fertilizers and manure23,24.
Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish between the effect of
biochar alone and the interaction effect of biochar and fertilizers to
minimize the uncertainty of the biochar application effect.
Initial soil properties, environmental conditions, biochar source,
characteristics, and application rate are the main factors influencing
the impacts of biochar on crop yield, soil properties, and greenhouse
gas emissions. Climate conditions are widely recognized as a major
factor, as crop growth requires both temperature and
precipitation7,25,26. Additionally, differences in biochar
characteristics and initial soil properties could significantly affect
crop growth, carbon decomposition, and nitrogen transformation by
regulating the degradation and biochemical cycling of biochar. For
instance, previous research has demonstrated that the sources and
pyrolysis temperatures of biochar greatly influence its properties3,
which resulted in significant differences in the effect of biochar
application27,28,29. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of
biochar derived from different sources and pyrolysis temperatures can
help improve the utilization efficiency of agricultural wastes.
Furthermore, there is an urgent need to quantify these factors on the
effect size of biochar application on crop production, soil quality,
and greenhouse gas emissions to evaluate the benefits and impacts of
biochar application in agroecosystems.
Here, we collected a dataset from peer-reviewed studies that compared
crop yield, soil properties, and greenhouse gas emissions under three
conditions: no biochar, biochar applied alone, and biochar combined
fertilizers. Only peer-reviewed studies meeting specific criteria were
digitized and integrated into our dataset. In this dataset, 891
independent experiments derived globally from 367 studies were
synthesized to examine the response of biochar application. This
dataset consists of 21 variables under control and biochar application
treatments, including soil properties, crop yield, and greenhouse gas
emissions. Information from the original studies on data sources,
climate conditions, biochar properties, management practices, and
initial soil properties is also included in this dataset. We intend to
continue expanding the dataset and are open to contributions of
additional data. Newly published data could be added to this
open-source dataset for future real-time updates. The dataset can be
performed for literature reviews and bibliometric research to explore
research progress and frontiers. Furthermore, meta-analyses based on
this dataset can examine the effect size of biochar on crop yield,
soil properties, and greenhouse emissions from a global perspective.
This dataset has significance in recommending appropriate management
practices for farmers, stakeholders, and scientists, enabling them to
develop sustainable agricultural strategies and production policies.
Moreover, it could serve as a reference for biochar production with
agricultural waste utilization (Fig. 1).
Data processing approach for data collection, screening, integrating,
and the potential utilization of the dataset.
Methods
Data collection
To establish a comprehensive dataset on the effect of biochar on crop
yield, soil properties, and greenhouse gas emissions in the global
agricultural ecosystem, we implemented strict criteria to obtain
closely relevant data from the Web of Science (https://www.webofscience.com/wos/alldb/basic-search),
Google Scholar (https://www.scholar.google.com), and China National
Knowledge Infrastructure (http://www.cnki.net). We used the keywords
“biochar” and “crop productivity” or “crop yield” or “grain yield” or
the keywords “biochar” and “soil properties” or “soil indicators” to
conduct our research. All the selected studies and experimental data
adhered to the following requirements: (a) Manipulative field,
laboratory, and incubation experiments were conducted. Targeted
experiments included a control (with no biochar addition) group and a
treatment group (with biochar addition), with each group having no
less than three plots as replicates; (b) No biochar was applied before
or during the targeted experiments in the control group. For treatment
groups, studies were obliged to specify whether biochar was applied
alone (B) or combined with fertilizers (BF); (c) Data on soil
properties, crop yield, and greenhouse gas emissions under B and BF
was recorded in the studies; (d) Experimental data could be obtained
directly from figures, tables, or text (Fig. 1). If necessary, GetData
Graph Digitizer 2.24 was used to extract data from the figures.
A total of 2438 paired items under biochar addition experiments from
367 published studies were collected after searching and selection.
The spatial distribution of the targeted sites is shown in Fig. 2.
These studies consisted of 1686 B and 752 BF treatments. Among them,
799 items provided data with SOC contents, 1984 with crop yield, and
542 with global warming potential (GWP) determinations. In addition to
SOC, soil properties such as pH, total and available nitrogen and
phosphorus, base cations, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and
microbial biomass were also extracted from the selected studies.
Besides, the dataset includes information on greenhouse gas intensity
(GHGI), as well as CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions. Considering that
biochar properties were significant influencing factors, we obtained
and incorporated data on biochar type, application rate, pH, pyrolysis
temperature, ash content, carbon content, and nitrogen content into
the dataset. Furthermore, the dataset provides information on the
first author, publication year, site location (country, latitude, and
longitude), and climate variables (mean annual temperature (MAT) and
precipitation (MAP)).
The spatial distribution of sites included in the
dataset of biochar application effects. B, biochar application; BM,
biochar application plus manure; BN, biochar application plus nitrogen
fertilizer; BNK, biochar application plus nitrogen and potassium
fertilizers; BNP, biochar application plus nitrogen and phosphorus
fertilizers; BNPK, biochar application plus nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium fertilizers; BNPKM, biochar application plus nitrogen,
phosphorus, potassium fertilizers, and manure; BP, biochar application
plus phosphorus fertilizer; BPK, biochar application plus phosphorus
and potassium fertilizers.
Data processing
The climate zones of sites were supplemented in the dataset according
to the latitude and longitude coordinates if no relevant information
is provided in the studies. The climate zones were grouped into tropic
(23.5 °S to 23.5 °N), subtropic (23.5 to 35 °S and °N), temperate (35
to 50 °S and °N), and (sub)arctic (>50 °S and °N) zones. Climate
conditions, biochar properties, and initial soil properties were
directly extracted from the targeted literature. The dataset covered a
wide geographic range, with latitudes ranging from −43.65° to 62.50°
and longitudes ranging from −155.69° to 172.46°. MAT varied from
1.5 °C to 32.0 °C, and MAP ranged from 45 mm to 2870 mm (Fig. 3).
There were also wide variations in biochar application rate, biochar
properties, and initial soil properties among different studies (Table
1). Soil texture was classified into sandy soil, loamy soil, and
clayey soil based on the soil classification system of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture. Soil pH was measured by different methods
in our dataset. If soil pH was measured by the method of CaCl2
solution, the following equation was used to obtain the value of soil
pH (H2O):
The wetness index was a combined measure of
climate conditions, which was calculated using MAT and MAP as the
following equation:
Wetnessindex=MAP/(MAT+10)
Data Records
All data and R code could be downloaded according
to the FAIR principles32. The dataset is provided in spreadsheet
format with the title “BiocharDS_V1.0”. This data file includes 2439
rows and 209 columns, containing data from 367 studies (The detailed
references were listed in the sheet “Reference” and are matched with
the data). Each column corresponds to specific information on study
details, site location, climate conditions, initial soil properties,
biochar properties, management information, soil properties, crop
yield, and greenhouse gas emissions. Each row includes as many
comparisons of data variables as possible between treatment and
control. The explanations and units of the data are marked in the
worksheet “Explanation and unit”. It should be noted that all the
units of each property have been converted to the same unit even
though units of the same property might differ. There are nine
treatment groups: (1) biochar application alone (B); (2) biochar
application plus manure (BM); (3) biochar application plus nitrogen
fertilizer (BN); (4) biochar application plus nitrogen and potassium
fertilizers (BNK); (5) biochar application plus nitrogen and
phosphorus fertilizers (BNP); (6) biochar application plus nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers (BNPK); (7) biochar application
plus nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizers, and manure (BNPKM);
(8) biochar application plus phosphorus fertilizer (BP); (9) biochar
application plus phosphorus and potassium fertilizers (BPK). All the
treatments except B are collectively referred to as the BF group. The
whole dataset is constructed of 891 independent experiments, including
700 under B and 314 under BF. “BiocharDS_V1.0.csv” is a simplified
version of “BiocharDS_V1.0.xlsx” that only contains target
information. There is another Rscript named “Biochar. R” that includes
codes to generate the location of the sites and check the distribution
of key information in the dataset. The “BiocharDS_V1.0.csv” file can
be used to generate the figures.
Technical Validation
The authenticity of the data to the original
source was checked before data extraction. Duplicate studies were
removed during selection. Each study was read at least twice, with
particular attention given to the sections involving data (materials
and methods, tables, figures, and supplementary materials). Data
extracted from the tables or figures were cross-checked with the
original files to ensure accurate digitization. Quality control was
performed after data extraction to check the availability of the data.
The formats of each column (numerical or string) were checked to
correct any mistyping in the numerical columns.
After data extraction, we checked the distribution of all the
variables. Outliers and/or extreme points were manually checked for
potential errors by reviewing the data and units in the studies. The
response ratio (RR) and natural log-transformed response ratio (Ln
(RR)) of each variable of soil properties, crop yield, and greenhouse
gas emissions were calculated. RR and Ln (RR) were calculated as
formulas (7) and (8) respectively.
where Mt and Mc are the mean under the biochar
application and control, respectively.
The frequency distributions of Ln (RR) for some key variables were
plotted to verify the normality of the data. The results showed the
effects of biochar on SOC, TN, pH, crop yield, GWP, and GHGI varied
greatly among experimental sites and displayed normal distributions
(Fig. 4). For other variables, we compared the range of Ln (RR) of
variables with other meta-analysis studies to ensure data
availability7,8,9,10,11,33,34,35. Additionally, extreme values of Ln
(RR) were validated from the original studies.
Frequency distribution of the natural
log-transformed response ratio of biochar application on soil organic
carbon (SOC) (a), total nitrogen (TN) (b), pH (c), crop yield (d),
global warming potential (GWP) (e), and greenhouse gas emission
intensity (GHGI) (f) in the dataset. The blue curve is a Gaussian
distribution fitted to frequency data, and P < 0.01 suits the
distribution.
Usage Notes
In the dataset of biochar application effects on
crop yield, soil properties, and greenhouse gas emissions
(BiocharDS_V1.0), the variables and units in each column are the same.
Please note that the treatment group is classified not only based on
the application of fertilizers and biochar but also according to the
control treatment (e.g., the treatment under biochar application plus
nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers is also B treatment if
the control is under nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers).
Soil sampling depths in the dataset are different between studies, and
90.48% of the items represent surface soil (soil depth ≤20 cm). This
dataset is valuable for conducting literature reviews, bibliometric
research, and meta-analyses of biochar application in agroecosystems.
The inclusion of different biochar sources and properties in the
dataset can provide a reference for improving the efficiency of
re-utilizing agricultural waste resources. Moreover, it can serve as a
reference for the evaluation of management practice selection for
sustainable agricultural production and climate change mitigation. For
any inquiries regarding code understanding or data usage, users can
contact the corresponding author.
Code availability
Data visualization was conducted using R (version 3.5.1). The Rscript
“BiocharDS_V1.0. R” includes codes to generate the location of the
sites (Fig. 2)
and check the distribution of key information in the dataset (Figs 3, 4).
All the code and data used are available.
References
-
Lal, R. Soil Carbon Sequestration
Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security. Science 304,
1623–1627 (2004).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
-
Wiesmeier, M. et
al. Carbon sequestration potential of soils in southeast Germany
derived from stable soil organic carbon saturation. Glob.
Change Biol. 20,
653–665 (2014).
Article ADS Google
Scholar
-
Smith, P. Soil carbon sequestration
and biochar as negative emission technologies. Glob.
Change Biol. 22,
1315–1324 (2016).
Article ADS Google
Scholar
-
Lehmann, J. A handful of carbon. Nature 447,
143–144 (2007).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
-
Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D. &
Hipps, N. A. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural
benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant
Soil 337,
1–18 (2010).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Glaser, B., Lehmann, J. & Zech, W.
Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered
soils in the tropics with charcoal - a review. Biol.
Fertil. Soils 35,
219–230 (2002).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
He, Y. et
al. Effects of biochar application on soil greenhouse gas
fluxes: a meta‐analysis. GCB
Bioenergy 9,
743–755 (2017).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Liu, X. et
al. Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on
experimental conditions—a meta-analysis of literature data. Plant
Soil 373,
583–594 (2013).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Liu, S. et
al. Response of soil carbon dioxide fluxes, soil organic carbon
and microbial biomass carbon to biochar amendment: a meta‐analysis. GCB
Bioenergy 8,
392–406 (2016).
Article ADS CAS Google
Scholar
-
Biederman, L. A. & Harpole, W. S.
Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling:
a meta‐analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5,
202–214 (2013).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Chagas, J. K. M., Figueiredo, C. C. D.
& Ramos, M. L. G. Biochar increases soil carbon pools: Evidence from
a global meta-analysis. J. Environ.
Manage. 305,
114403 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
-
Xu, H. et
al. Effects of biochar application on crop productivity, soil
carbon sequestration, and global warming potential controlled by
biochar C:N ratio and soil pH: A global meta-analysis. Soil
Tillage Res. 213,
105125 (2021).
Article Google
Scholar
-
Clough, T. J. & Condron, L. M. Biochar
and the Nitrogen Cycle: Introduction. J.
Environ. Qual. 39,
1218–1223 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
-
Harter, J. et
al. Linking N2O
emissions from biochar-amended soil to the structure and function of
the N-cycling microbial community. ISME
J 8,
660–674 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
-
He, L. et
al. Biochar mitigated more N-related global warming potential in
rice season than that in wheat season: An investigation from
ten-year biochar-amended rice-wheat cropping system of China. Sci.
Total Environ. 821,
153344 (2022).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
-
Huang, R. et
al. Increases in temperature response to CO2 emissions
in biochar-amended vegetable field soil. Environ.
Sci. Pollut. Res. 29,
50895–50905 (2022).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Nan, Q., Hu, S., Qin, Y. & Wu, W.
Methane oxidation activity inhibition via high amount aged biochar
application in paddy soil. Sci.
Total Environ. 796,
149050 (2021).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
-
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A.,
Kammann, C. & Abalos, D. Biochar effects on methane emissions from
soils: A meta-analysis. Soil Biol.
Biochem. 101,
251–258 (2016).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Ji, C. et
al. Variation in Soil Methane Release or Uptake Responses to
Biochar Amendment: A Separate Meta-analysis. Ecosystems 21,
1692–1705 (2018).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Wu, Z., Zhang, X., Dong, Y., Li, B. &
Xiong, Z. Biochar amendment reduced greenhouse gas intensities in
the rice-wheat rotation system: six-year field observation and
meta-analysis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 278,
107625 (2019).
Article Google
Scholar
-
Cayuela, M. L., Jeffery, S. & Van
Zwieten, L. The molar H: Corg ratio of biochar is a key factor in
mitigating N2O emissions from soil. Agric.
Ecosyst. Environ. 202,
135–138 (2015).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Fu, J. et
al. Co-application of biochar and organic amendments on soil
greenhouse gas emissions: A meta-analysis. Sci.
Total Environ. 897,
166171 (2023).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
-
Jia, X., Yan, W., Ma, H. & Shangguan,
Z. Antagonistic and synergistic interactions dominate GHGs fluxes,
soil properties and yield responses to biochar and N addition. Front.
Environ. Sci. 11,
1123897 (2023).
Article Google
Scholar
-
He, Y. et
al. Antagonistic interaction between biochar and nitrogen
addition on soil greenhouse gas fluxes: A global synthesis. GCB
Bioenergy 13,
1636–1648 (2021).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Crane-Droesch, A., Abiven, S.,
Jeffery, S. & Torn, M. S. Heterogeneous global crop yield response
to biochar: a meta-regression analysis. Environ.
Res. Lett. 8,
044049 (2013).
Article ADS Google
Scholar
-
Jeffery, S. et
al. Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields. Environ.
Res. Lett. 12,
053001 (2017).
Article ADS Google
Scholar
-
He, L., Zhao, X., Wang, S. & Xing, G.
The effects of rice-straw biochar addition on nitrification activity
and nitrous oxide emissions in two Oxisols. Soil
Tillage Res. 164,
52–62 (2016).
Article Google
Scholar
-
Nelissen, V. et
al. Maize biochars accelerate short-term soil nitrogen dynamics
in a loamy sand soil. Soil Biol.
Biochem. 55,
20–27 (2012).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Berglund, L. M., DeLuca, T. H. &
Zackrisson, O. Activated carbon amendments to soil alters
nitrification rates in Scots pine forests. Soil
Biol. Biochem. 36,
2067–2073 (2004).
Article CAS Google
Scholar
-
Zhang, A. et
al. Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and
greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: A field study of 2
consecutive rice growing cycles. Field
Crop. Res. 127,
153–160 (2012).
Article Google
Scholar
-
Hou, E. et
al. Global meta-analysis shows pervasive phosphorus limitation
of aboveground plant production in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Nat.
Commun. 11,
637 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed
Central Google
Scholar
-
Li, X. et
al. A global dataset of biochar application effects on crop
yield, soil properties, and greenhouse gas emissions. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6622375.v1 (2023).
-
Mukherjee, A., Lal, R. & Zimmerman, A. R. Effects of biochar and
other amendments on the physical properties and greenhouse gas
emissions of an artificially degraded soil. Sci.
Total Environ. 487,
26–36 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
-
Singh, H., Northup, B. K., Rice, C. W.
& Prasad, P. V. V. Biochar applications influence soil physical and
chemical properties, microbial diversity, and crop productivity: a
meta-analysis. Biochar 4,
8 (2022).
Article ADS CAS Google
Scholar
-
Wei, W. et
al. Biochar effects on crop yields and nitrogen loss depending
on fertilization. Sci. Total
Environ. 702,
134423 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google
Scholar
Download references
Acknowledgements
We thank all the authors whose work was
included in our dataset. This work was financially supported by
the National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources
Investigation Project of China (2021FY100500) and Central
Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund
(Y2023LM03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
-
State Key Laboratory of Efficient
Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China,
Key Laboratory of Arable Land Quality Monitoring and Evaluation,
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Institute of
Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of
Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
Xin Li, Dong Wu, Xue Liu, Yaping Huang, Jiwei
Ran, Jing Xiao & Wenju Zhang
-
TERRA Teaching and Research Centre,
Gembloux AgroBio Tech, University of Liège, 5030, Gembloux,
Belgium
Xin Li
-
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environment,
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of
Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese
Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
Andong Cai
-
Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the
Agri-environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture,
College Natural of Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F
University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China
Hu Xu
Contributions
Xin Li and Wenju Zhang conceived this paper.
Dong Wu, Xue Liu, Yaping Huang, Jiwei Ran, and Jing Xiao extracted
and integrated the data from studies into BiocharDS_V1.0. Xin Li
summarized the dataset and drafted the manuscript. Hu Xu and
Andong Cai provided important assistance in completing and
analyzing the data. All authors revised and approved the
manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Wenju
Zhang.
Green Play Ammonia™, Yielder® NFuel Energy.
Spokane, Washington. 99212
509 995 1879
Cell, Pacific Time Zone.
General office:
509-254
6854
4501 East Trent
Ave.
Spokane, WA 99212
|